>From Simon's description, I think this is the "Geocode" in question: http://geocode.biz/
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Hugo Holscher <hugoholsc...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Simon, > > that you may nor hear from them might be very true: see here: > http://www.geocode.com/ > Is apparently part of TomTom, so if you need more info, might be handy to > check with them. They are Dutch so if I can oblige, let me know, Hugo > > > *From:* Simon Poole <si...@osmfoundation.org> > *Sent:* Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:38 PM > *To:* openstreetmap <talk@openstreetmap.org> ; osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org > *Subject:* [Osmf-talk] Use of terms similar to "GEOCODE" > > **** > > ** > As I promised in February I investigated with our North American counsel > what they would consider acceptable use of terms similar to the GEOCODE > trademark, they came back with examples that they all considered OK. I've > created a wiki page for future reference > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geocode_Trademark > ** > > **I apologize for the delay, I was waiting for some closure on the > matter, however the company in question has not responded to our > correspondence. Personally I don't expect to hear from them again since it > now must be clear that there is no money in it for them. > ** > > **Simon > ** > > > **** > > ------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > osmf-talk mailing list > osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
