No that is not beside the point at all. cuisine=vegetarian has 871 uses diet:vegetarian has 456 uses
Because diet:... is approved people are suddenly allowed to write on both the cuisine page and the diet:... page that you shouldn't use cuisine=vegetarian? gluten_free=yes has 53 uses diet:gluten_free has 88 uses This insignificant difference suddenly lets you declare one key as controversial and hardly used? You can't play the numbers game only when it suits you and stay believable. Or maybe we should be grateful that the diet:... keys only contain one colon and just accept it :rolleyes: On 07/04/2013 10:47 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 04.07.2013 22:15, Cartinus wrote: >> Have you noticed that there are many other people within OSM who think >> the wiki proposal system is completely broken and should be >> abolished/ignored? > > Yes, but that's beside the point. If that key was already widely used, > then it would of course deserve a Key:* page without a proposal or vote. > > However, the key only has 53 uses and is also controversial, so I > believe it should not yet be presented as if it were established. > > Moving this into the proposal namespace makes it clear that this is just > an idea at this point, but lets people find it if they search for > "gluten free". It doesn't mean that it will necessarily ever go through > an RFC, vote or whatever - it can also just sit there until it enough > people have used it. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- --- m.v.g., Cartinus _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
