2013/9/21 Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> > Hi, > > > The remaining question is, what should be the correct behavior? > > My assumption until now was: > > * If a multipolygon is untagged - where "untagged" means that it has no > tags except a small list (type, source, source:*, note) then it will > simply receive *all* tags from all (outer) member ways, but processing > will fail if these tags differ in values. >
but this introduces a lot of complexity, especially in the case of MPs with many outer members, when you only want to modify the tags of a single one of these (outer) ways. Many editors (e.g. on smartphones) will not even notify you that the way is part of a relation. > * If the multipolygon is tagged (with anything except type, source, note > etc) then those are the tags for the polygon and way tags will not be > looked at. > do you also include "name" in this list? > * If the tags of the inner way differ from the tags of the outer way or > the tags of the relation, except source, note etc., then the inner way > will become a separate polygon. > all tags, or only "the relevant" ones? And if yes, which ones aren't relevant? And also here there might be cases where e.g. inside a forest you will want to have another forest because of some properties they don't share (be it name but also note etc.) cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
