2014-03-25 17:23 GMT+01:00 SomeoneElse <li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk>:
> (just something that I noticed while checking for local overlapping > changesets) > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20990644 > > seems to have made a number of "tag merges" to "landuse=port". > > Apologies for the noise if it's already been discussed and agreed on an > import list somewhere; just mentioning it in case someone was relying on > the tags that have been removed and wasn't expecting the changes. > > Hi Andy, I did the manually via JOSM. I found different uses (port,port_terminal and variations) and merged together. In Europe I was using it mostly, and migrated to the formal proposal[0] [1], the others were: - one in USA which fitted my proposal and I adjusted it - the others were delimitations of port subareas and fitted the definition (were untouched by some time and I tried to improve the geometry). I'd like to move the set of proposals to voting one of these days, but haven't had the time yet. Cheers, > > Andy > Regards, Stefano [0] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dport [1] http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/RFC-Classification-for-ports-and-inland-terminals-td5792661.html > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
