> From: Mikel Maron [mailto:mikel_ma...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:07 PM > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Organizational mapping policy > > I have to say, my initial reaction to this proposal was that it was > heavy handed, unnecessarily punitive, over reaching, and not in the > spirit of OSM. A cure worse than the disease.
To clarify (and I could have made this more explicit) there is *not* a proposed policy here. The DWG is considering if it is necessary to issue guidelines, it is not decided that something needs to be issued or the contents of anything we'd issue. The items listed are possible requirements and possible covered activities only. It is extremely unlikely that any policy resulting from this will include all the possible requirements and cover all the possible activities. I'm personally against some of the requirements listed as possibilities. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
