Well, you should at least take preference to man_made=bridge[1] if there is any. Highways can be split, just like in my example, and then that looks as if there are two bridges. What if there is a footway running besides the road? Should it also get the wikidata tag?
If we start putting wikidata=* on highways, there should be an initiative to add man_made=bridge on those and move the tag there. At least with bridges that have more than one highway on them. The same story is with tunnels, although I see there is no page with man_made=tunnel yet. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge 2014-08-28 19:42 GMT+02:00 Edward Betts <edw...@4angle.com>: > Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Bridges are bit of a grey area, is a highway with bridge=yes really a > > bridge, or is it a highway which has a property of being on a bridge? I > > think we should map these notable bridges as an area with man_made=bridge > > and put the tag on that. > > The very first example of a bridge on your list is already problematic: > > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5620489 > > That way represents both the street and the bridge. I don't think there is > any problem with adding a tag for the matching item on wikidata. > > http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q4547392 > > -- > Edward. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk