> Il giorno 17/set/2014, alle ore 22:32, "Dave F." <dave...@madasafish.com> ha > scritto: > > As an example: If it has a name you'd have two objects of that name, when in > fact there's only one. If someone wanted to find out how many named wood > there are in a city it would return inaccurate data.
I agree with this, that's why IMO we should have 2 distinct kind of properties (and maybe objects), one kind for name (and type of thing) and one kind for descriptions of subobjects like an area where trees grows. inside a named forest you might have lots of areas without actual trees. Eg natural=wood and name=* vs. landcover=trees cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
