Steve Coast suggested changing the mission statement of OSM to be something like “The world’s best addressable map” I thought I'd separate out this into a new thread. As some backup, I attended my first SOTM-US in 2012 where Steve proposed we build an addressable map. A group of us from Seattle decided that we'd take that challenge and import addresses for Seattle. That import was completed.
Here are the address related comments: On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > wrote: > 2014-10-22 12:15 GMT+02:00 Steve Coast <st...@asklater.com>: > >> Together, we could do this in 6-12 months and finish addressing in 1-3 >> years. At that point we wouldn’t have just made the world slightly better, >> we would have put a big dent in the universe. Nobody would use a closed map >> ever again, and it would be people like you that made it happen. >> > > > > I agree with you that addressing is very important for a lot of commercial > (and non-commercial) map users. What I don't understand is how a paid board > would help us map more addresses. Unfortunately mapping addresses is > typically less fun than going to the video arcade. Looking at the current > figures we are not doing too bad. Currently there are 130 Million buildings > in OSM and 46 Million housenumbers. I don't know exactly how many buildings > there are in the world, and how many of them don't have addresses, but I > guess it will be at least 1 Billion addresses in the world, probably more. > According to the stats page we have roughly 25.000 active contributors a > month ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stats#Contributor_Stats ). To > get an address on all currently mapped buildings in three years time, (84M > to go), every active contributor would have to add 93 addresses a month - > constantly. To get 1 Billion addresses mapped by 25.000 contributors in 3 > yrs, it would be 1111 housenumbers a month per active contributor. Are we > planning to pay the mappers as well? The only solution seems to get more > contributors mapping, and have them insert addresses. On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > It would be nice to know how many of the buildings and house numbers in > OSM were imported versus surveyed / drawn by hand. I have a bad feeling > about how feasible it is to crowd surf house numbers. On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Oleksiy Muzalyev < oleksiy.muzal...@bluewin.ch> wrote: > It is not necessary to put down a number on each building. It is possible > to use *addr:interpolation* (*odd, even*, or *all*). > > We put down a number on the first building, then on the last, connect them > in JOSM, and add *addr:interpolation: all *. For example here: > http://osm.org/go/0CFn0AZ_d--?m= . It is also very useful on a street > with many small houses. And it is searchable. For example if there is > number 15 and number 27 on the map for a street, and they are connected > with *addr:interpolation: odd, *and if one searches number 21, the map > will show the number 21 all right. > > Then, there is another approach. We first map addressable large building, > where a lot of people live or work. Kind of of going after the low-hanging > fruit. On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Matthijs Melissen <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl > wrote: > On 22 October 2014 12:37, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Currently there are 130 Million buildings > > in OSM and 46 Million housenumbers. > > Do we know how many of these addresses come from imports? I wouldn't > be surprised if over 90% of the housenumbers in OSM come from imports. > > The Dutch BAG import accounts for 8 million adresses, and the Czech > RUIAN import accounts for 3 million addresses. Then there have also > been large imports at least in Germany, Poland, and France, but for > these countries I can't find exact numbers. -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk