Now that we have an "anointed" notes system, how about an automated move to notes, with the owner of the note being the person who originated the FIXME?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:38 AM, John F. Eldredge <j...@jfeldredge.com> wrote: > I agree. In most cases, a FIXME should be left until someone on-site can > verify what is correct. > > -- > John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com > "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot > drive out hate; only love can do that." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. > > > > > On February 26, 2015 3:49:58 AM Jonathan Bennett <jonobenn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 26/02/2015 08:43, Andreas Labres wrote: >> > This confirmation of course could be automated: show the user the >> > object with the tags on some areal imagery background and she/he can >> decide (in >> > most cases, I'd say). >> >> No -- the aerial imagery could be out of date, and it may not be >> possible to tell if the problem has been fixed (or even existed in the >> first place) *only* from aerial images. Confirmation by survey would >> reliable. >> >> If the "problem" is in an area where there's no-one to survey, then so >> what? Fixmes don't show up on any end-user (as opposed to mapping QA) >> rendering, they don't mess up routing, they don't affect geocoding or >> have any other negative consequences for consumers of the data. So just >> leave them be until someone can get to the area to survey. >> >> J. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
