Depends what you're after really. I'm impressed by GraphHopper's job in suggesting a foot route between Southampton and the village I spent my teenage years, 60km away - it actually suggests a route very close to the one I would have chosen myself. A bit more roads than ideal, but it is impressive.
________________________________ From: Janko Mihelic <jan...@gmail.com> Sent: 17 June 2015 10:00 To: Hans De Kryger; OpenStreetMap Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Routing Applications If you ask me, they are all in their infancy. Non of these routing services even route right. In a turn restriction the "via" role can be a way. Neither OSRM, ORS or GraphHopper knows how to restrict that, and that's IMHO one of the crucial parts of a routing engine. When one of them starts routing right, than we can talk about picking a winner service. Right now only MapQuest knows how to route. Janko sri, 17. lip 2015. 05:34 Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryge...@gmail.com<mailto:hans.dekryge...@gmail.com>> je napisao: Why do OSRM & OpenRoutingService compete against each other instead of joining resources and combining efforts to make the best routing service out there? Am i missing something? I know it's nice to have different services for different uses but this doesn't seem like a good use of resources at all. I may be the only one with this opinion, but this has bug me for awhile. Regards, Hans http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13 *Sorry for any misspellings* _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
