Imagine a single-carriageway road crossing a dual-carriageway road.
All turns are allowed except u-turns from one side of the
dual-carriageway to the other. This common situation can only be
modeled using a turn restriction with a via way.

Now if the via way had to be split for any reason, then you have
multiple via ways.

On 6/17/15, Michael Reichert <naka...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 2015-06-17 um 14:38 schrieb Eugene Alvin Villar:
>> This has been fixed in Osmand early this year after being reported
>> more than 2 years ago. Unfortunately, multiple via ways are still not
>> supported.
>
> I wonder if a via way instead of an via node is necessary so much. I
> wonder more where someone /really/ needs multiple via ways. Can you call
> examples for multiple via ways (link to relation)?
>
> Best regard
>
> Michael
>
>
> --
> Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
> ausgenommen)
> I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
>
>

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to