On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:14:28PM +0200, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: > TL;DR: argument repeat, sorry. > > On 09/09/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> OSM is map of the current state of the world - not map > >> of the world how it was yesterday, 10 years ago or five thousands ago. > > > > Nobody is advocating to map the past, what is discussed is mapping those > > elements of the past which somehow have lasted or have had a strong impact > > that is still observable today. > > Martin, have a look at http://osm.org/go/Zc9j8qfSV-?m (near Russ's > most recent example) and tell me how this section "somehow has lasted > or has had a strong impact that is still observable today". Whenever I > looked at some examples posted by Russ, these kind of sections weren't > far.
Not much is visible from the satelite but this is true for many other objects. Richard _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
