Rowers2 is doing a good job, he is a kind of "turbomapper".See this:
http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.0959006&lon=17.0250060&zoom=163D model of
Wroclaw in Poland, done by rowers2.He makes also many of bug fixes in
Poland.Cheers,Marek
Dnia 12 listopada 2015 0:29 Jo napisał(a):
He has indeed done some good work as well. I removed the 10-15% that wasn't.
Jo 2015-11-12 0:19 GMT+01:00 john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com>:Looking
more closely he's dropped in some 24,000 objects in this bit of Cameroon most
are useful and legit.
I've dropped him a message and hopefully he'll clean up the the data.
Thanks John On 11 November 2015 at 18:08, Michał Brzozowski
<www.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:I meant they are purely fictional. He created
these rows of buildings
to test something, like different 3d attributes or whatever. They
shouldn't exist in OSM.
The legit ones I refered to are eg.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341996660 which are just at one
corner of your bbox.
Michał
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The buildings are not in Cameroon though.
>
> I wrote him a changeset comment:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34368108#map=3/31.80/21.27
>
> Polyglot
>
> 2015-11-11 23:49 GMT+01:00 Michał Brzozowski <www.ha...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> I seem to know why he's doing this and at users:Poland forum he was
>> instructed not to do this. He's testing rendering of OSM-3D in some
>> web maps (f4map?).
>>
>> Feel free to delete it. For the future, use changeset comments first,
>> if you didn't. It his activity persists, go DWG on him.
>>
>> The takeaway is that whoever is he testing against, should offer some
>> testing with our dev database or .osm files.
>>
>> As per point on the second column, these are legit buildings, visible
on
>> Bing.
>>
>> Michał
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27 PM, john whelan
<jwhelan0...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Visible at
>> >
>> > 7.4396667 7.4711556
>> >
>> > 15.5891705 15.6047916
>> >
>> > There is nothing visible in Bing or Mapbox but that doesn't mean
much
>> > but
>> > the shape and detail of the edits are suspicious to me and they
seem to
>> > have
>> > made a very large number of edits recently in their history.
>> >
>> >
>> > Could someone be nice and take a peek?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks John
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > talk mailing list
>> > talk@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
