That's also the impression I got when looking at his edits in a superficial way.
Maybe I should ask him what I did wrong here: http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=47.0788995&lon=8.4305183&zoom=21 My first attempt at 3D Jo 2015-11-12 12:27 GMT+01:00 marekskleciak <mareksklec...@o2.pl>: > Rowers2 is doing a good job, he is a kind of "turbomapper". > See this: http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.0959006&lon=17.0250060&zoom=16 > 3D model of Wroclaw in Poland, done by rowers2. > He makes also many of bug fixes in Poland. > > > Cheers, > Marek > > > > Dnia 12 listopada 2015 0:29 Jo napisał(a): > > > > He has indeed done some good work as well. I removed the 10-15% that > wasn't. > > Jo > > 2015-11-12 0:19 GMT+01:00 john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com>: >> >> Looking more closely he's dropped in some 24,000 objects in this bit of >> Cameroon most are useful and legit. >> >> I've dropped him a message and hopefully he'll clean up the the data. >> >> Thanks John >> >> On 11 November 2015 at 18:08, Michał Brzozowski <www.ha...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I meant they are purely fictional. He created these rows of buildings >>> to test something, like different 3d attributes or whatever. They >>> shouldn't exist in OSM. >>> >>> The legit ones I refered to are eg. >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341996660 which are just at one >>> corner of your bbox. >>> >>> Michał >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > The buildings are not in Cameroon though. >>> > >>> > I wrote him a changeset comment: >>> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34368108#map=3/31.80/21.27 >>> > >>> > Polyglot >>> > >>> > 2015-11-11 23:49 GMT+01:00 Michał Brzozowski <www.ha...@gmail.com>: >>> >> >>> >> I seem to know why he's doing this and at users:Poland forum he was >>> >> instructed not to do this. He's testing rendering of OSM-3D in some >>> >> web maps (f4map?). >>> >> >>> >> Feel free to delete it. For the future, use changeset comments first, >>> >> if you didn't. It his activity persists, go DWG on him. >>> >> >>> >> The takeaway is that whoever is he testing against, should offer some >>> >> testing with our dev database or .osm files. >>> >> >>> >> As per point on the second column, these are legit buildings, visible >>> on >>> >> Bing. >>> >> >>> >> Michał >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > Visible at >>> >> > >>> >> > 7.4396667 7.4711556 >>> >> > >>> >> > 15.5891705 15.6047916 >>> >> > >>> >> > There is nothing visible in Bing or Mapbox but that doesn't mean >>> much >>> >> > but >>> >> > the shape and detail of the edits are suspicious to me and they >>> seem to >>> >> > have >>> >> > made a very large number of edits recently in their history. >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > Could someone be nice and take a peek? >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > Thanks John >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > talk mailing list >>> >> > talk@openstreetmap.org >>> >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> talk mailing list >>> >> talk@openstreetmap.org >>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>> > >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> > > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org <http:///?cmd=compose&to=talk@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
