This is the more logical interpretation; the key:lanes page should be updated. cycleway=lane is great, but where is the lane? What about multiple lanes? This does happen, and they're not always next to each other, and any location there's multiple bike lanes or bicycle turn lanes can't be completely properly mapped without this. This is a nagging issue for anyplace with complex bicycle infrastructure.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes, which describes > the ":lanes"- subkey. This page states: > > "Please be aware that this extension covers all kinds of lanes for all > kind of vehicles and is not restricted to motorized traffic." > > this means that all turn:lanes, change:lanes, access:lanes, > forward:lanes, backward:lanes, etc. should count ALL lanes. Only the > lanes-tag on its own count the lanes for motorized traffic. > BTW, this is often neglected by QA tools that try to compare the sum > of forward and backward lanes with the number in the lanes tag. > > regards > > m > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Abhishek Saikia > <saikia.abhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > The definition of a lane as per > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes > > is: > > > >> The lanes=* key should be used to specify the total number of traffic > >> lanes a road has which are available to motorised traffic wider than a > motor > >> cycle. > > > > For the guide, we are extending the same definition to turn:lanes. The > wiki > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn:lanes makes no mention of > how to > > incorporate cycles and non motorized vehicle into this tag. These are > still > > open questions that should be discussed by the community. > > > > Philip, if you have a particular example of how to tag turn lanes for > buses, > > we will incorporate it into the guide. > > > > Do keep giving more feedback. > > > > Regards, > > Abhishek > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> > wrote: > >> > >> Really, any restricted lane should be in the total lane count and have > the > >> appropriate lane permissions assigned. > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 11:24 -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Abhishek Saikia > >>> <saikia.abhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Marc, > >>> > >>> Thank you for the kind words and prompt feedback. `turn:lanes` are > >>> exclusively for vehicles and as per discussion with the OSRM team here: > >>> https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/2048, we are at > present > >>> ignoring adding cycle lanes during `turn:lanes` mapping. > >>> marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Bicycles are vehicles in most countries, and bike lanes do pose > problems > >>> for correct lane guidance, particularly in areas where these lanes are > full > >>> width instead of being a door-zone buffer. > >>> > >>> > >>> You will also need to consider bus lanes as well. > >>> > >>> Phil (trigpoint) > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> talk mailing list > >>> talk@openstreetmap.org > >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >>> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> talk mailing list > >> talk@openstreetmap.org > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > talk@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
