the whole process is too opaque. Also there are different protagonists posting on wiki and email list. The gallery tag clarification stalled, because what looked like a consensus on the email list had one loud opponent on the wiki and not many other voices. I did not see any voting. IMHO the process is inherently flawed.
On 2016년 06월 22일 15:17, Tomas Straupis wrote: > My question/proposal was about what to do with failed proposals in > general. That is: > 1. How to identify a "failed" proposal > 2. What to do with it > > My proposal for point 1 is: > If after say two years new schema does not get at least equal tagging > count as the old schema - proposal failed. > > My proposal for point 2 is: > Mark that proposal as filed" in wiki. Mark all wiki pages which were > marked as "deprecated" because of the failed proposal as "valid". > > P.S. This only influences proposals which are CHANGING tagging. > P.P.S. There should also be guards against such proposals in the first > place, but lets park it for now. > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
