I have just been encouraged to look at Street Complete by some odd notes I saw.

I installed it to find out what the app does. I was prompted at some point for my OSM credentials, which I now regret.

The app shows my local area plastered with questions about the road surface. In the UK residential roads are generally metalled. Are we really going to add a surface tag to every UK residential road? After I had entered the choice as an experiment I was expecting a note to appear - that's why I started looking at the app. When I looked at the road I discovered it had used my OSM credentials to add a surface tag to the road. There was no indication this would happen.

It also pointed out a few very short link connections with no name. That is sensible to me, why would a short (<10m ) link road have a name? When double confirmed that the road has no name, it added noname=yes to the road using my credentials, again without telling me.

These seem to be unnecessary tagging.

It also seems to have changed a pedestrian to a service because it has no name, again quietly.

Lint tools in general suffer from the problem that some people assume they are errors and fix them without checking. This app has the benefit of being a lint tool that you can carry around and check because you're there. However, I think it needs to be more transparent that it is making a change including specifying what change it is making and I think the list of 'things to check' seems a bit naive.

--
cheers
Chris Hill (chillly)


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to