There is a constant increae of organized contributions from Task Managers on QA
tools and I agree that this policy should include these various organized
contributions.
There should be a goal assure the follow-up of these various projects to assure
a better collective coordination of the mapping.
I am not sure that we could effectively have all organizers of Events create a
wiki page. But organizers like for example the Geoweek, that invite to create
local events should have a wiki page well documented. A section could be added
to list the specific events + who organize them.
The Changeset database is the place where we should be able to follow the
various mapping projects. There is actually no common way to document the QA or
TM host, the specific project and the various events connecting to the various
projects. To document how these various coordination tools should be reported
on the changesets would facilitate the follow-up.
Actually, not all instances of the Tasking Manager add an hashtag to document
the host and project no. For QA tools, specific projects / missions are not
documented either.
Pierre
Le mardi 21 novembre 2017 21:21:55 HNE, Yuri Astrakhan
<yuriastrak...@gmail.com> a écrit :
While this might not have been the intention, the
> b) directed by a third party exactly what and how to contribute to
OpenStreetMap
can be applied to any "challenge style" sites such as the MapRoulette or
Osmose. I think there should either be a clarification about this, an
additional discussion with the community, or a specific exclusion. I know that
the preamble is talking about paid editing, schools, and mapping events, but
the text below it seems to have a wider scope.
penstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
