4. Lipiec 2018 10:16 od j...@liotier.org <mailto:j...@liotier.org>:
> I am concerned about the cases where a building does exist in reality, the > shape is less than ten meters from its position, some of the shape > overlaps the building's position on the imagery and some of the shape > resembles some of the building. In those cases, there is some value in the > record: approximate position and area of the building. But there is also > the liability of having introduced a low-quality object in the database. > I would not hesitate to delete such objects. It may mean that countless hours of low-quality mapping is gone, but it is not justification to keep such data.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
