> I'd map that place like that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:ID_Screen_Shot_from_-32.0914374,_116.0129206.png
I agree. And a supplementary question... would you also add a no-left-turn restriction from https://osm.org/way/581948344 at https://osm.org/node/5680879176? I would, and have done in the past. But to be honest, I'm not sure if a turn like that (having already passed the slip lane designated for the turn) is legal or not. On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 20:47, Markus <selfishseaho...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 07:40, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > > On 2019-01-11 07:16, Petra Rajka - (p) wrote: > > > > > > > > See below two cases where we would simplify the geometry: > > > > > > * -32.0914374, 116.0129206 > > > > Is seen no big problem in how the roads are layed out there. Coming from > > the motorway there is a clear divider where the offramp connects to the > > Albany Highway. > > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596272469> and > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596272466> form a double-rectangle, > but there isn't such a divider. I'd map that place like that: > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:ID_Screen_Shot_from_-32.0914374,_116.0129206.png > > > I have more problems with the tags of the on- and offramp. They are > > mapped as motorway when they should be mapped as motorway_link. The two > > bridges in the on- and offramp are mapped as motorway_link. > > +1. I'd also delete the descriptions like Tonkin Highway Southbound > Ramp off to Albany Highway in the name tag unless the ramps are signed > like that on site. > > > > * -35.3409195, 149.1616891 > > > > Ways 77001149 and 77000891 should IMHO not be mapped like that but > > mapped with turn:lanes. > > +1 > > Regards > > Markus > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk