> I'd map that place like that:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:ID_Screen_Shot_from_-32.0914374,_116.0129206.png

I agree. And a supplementary question... would you also add a
no-left-turn restriction from https://osm.org/way/581948344 at
https://osm.org/node/5680879176? I would, and have done in the past. But to
be honest, I'm not sure if a turn like that (having already passed the slip
lane designated for the turn) is legal or not.

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 20:47, Markus <selfishseaho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 07:40, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >
> > On 2019-01-11 07:16, Petra Rajka - (p) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > See below two cases where we would simplify the geometry:
> > >
> > >       * -32.0914374, 116.0129206
> >
> > Is seen no big problem in how the roads are layed out there. Coming from
> > the motorway there is a clear divider where the offramp connects to the
> > Albany Highway.
>
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596272469> and
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596272466> form a double-rectangle,
> but there isn't such a divider. I'd map that place like that:
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:ID_Screen_Shot_from_-32.0914374,_116.0129206.png
>
> > I have more problems with the tags of the on- and offramp. They are
> > mapped as motorway when they should be mapped as motorway_link. The two
> > bridges in the on- and offramp are mapped as motorway_link.
>
> +1. I'd also delete the descriptions like Tonkin Highway Southbound
> Ramp off to Albany Highway in the name tag unless the ramps are signed
> like that on site.
>
> > >       * -35.3409195, 149.1616891
> >
> > Ways 77001149 and 77000891 should IMHO not be mapped like that but
> > mapped with turn:lanes.
>
> +1
>
> Regards
>
> Markus
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to