This attitude: “to do well we would need people responsible and there isn’t 
any; you can do your thing without OSM infrastructure so why bother; nobody 
died, stop your hype and comply” — is why we’re still with API 0.6 ten years 
after it was introduced.

Ilya

> On 22 Apr 2019, at 09:35, Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:03:40AM +0300, Ilya Zverev wrote:
>> In my research of API 0.6 (which turned ten years old yesterday) I've
>> stumbled on this page:
>> 
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6/Crowd_sourced_Testing
>> 
>> It was deleted 7 years ago. And this is a disaster. The page was an
>> important milestone in our history: authors, dates, items on it could bring
>> some more information on how our current API was rolled out. Nothing is
>> left.
> 
> It was deleted an yet you have found it. So not a huge desaster after
> all.
> 
>> Please, could we have a deletion policy in our wiki that clearly states "No
>> obsolete pages here", forbidding deletion of anything except spam or
>> otherwise harmful pages? Deleting our history is plain vandalism, no better
>> than physically destroying pieces of human history displayed in museums.
> 
> Isn't that a bit of hype here...
> 
>> It's not like we're pressed for disk space there.
> 
> No, we aren't. But we are pressed for time and human attention. Of we
> had curators who keep important things organized and findable we could
> keep things forever. But as it is, all the obsolete crap keeps us from
> finding and working with what we need now.
> 
>> Thank internet gods for the Internet Archive,
> 
> Not the gods but some good people who had a good idea. Let them do their
> job and keep the history and lets do our job and keep the momentum in
> the project instead of spending our time looking back.
> 
> Jochen
> -- 
> Jochen Topf  joc...@remote.org  https://www.jochentopf.com/  +49-351-31778688


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to