Am 10.06.2019 um 21:05 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier: > On 6/10/19 5:28 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:47 PM Yves <yve...@mailbox.org >> <mailto:yve...@mailbox.org>> wrote: >> >> I think a small '(c)OSM' for small screen web or app could be >> suggested as OK, what do you think? >> >> >> Why not revive this dormant proposal for a small attribution logo >> that was proposed 6 years >> ago:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RFC_Attribution_Mark >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RFC_Attribution_Mark> > I have always wondered why it did not get more attention...
Because of legal issues with both the proposed logo and using it as a replacement for "OpenStreetMap" for attribution purposes that have been mentioned more than once (it should be noted by the way that neither the goog or Mapbox use anything else than their full name for attribution). Simon > But I'm not the target audience. So, do we have feedback from web > designers - the population who this proposal aims to convince to > attribute properly ? > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
