I've spent several hours creating wiki pages for the new, approved tags from this proposal, so I'm in favor of the tags, even office=diplomatic (which doesn't seem much of an improvement, compared to the others).
But I'm not convinced that adding the office=diplomatic tag to existing features is very helpful. It would be more useful to add diplomatic=embassy/consulate/liaison and the additional subtags to show the precise type of embassy or consulate or other diplomatic facility, but this probably requires local survey or at least extensive searching of web pages for every feature. On 6/19/19, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 18.06.19 03:21, Warin wrote: >> Following the successful proposal of introducing office=diplomatic to >> eventually replace the amenity=embassy (which is used to not only tag >> embassies but other diplomatic service) I am proposing to add the >> approved tag office=diplomatic to all instances that have both the tag >> amenity=embassy with the tag country=*. > > I don't think that this is necessary or helpful. When office=diplomatic > was "approved", we did not discuss a mass addition to existing features. > This is something that time can solve, we don't need an automatic edit > for it. > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
