Am 09.09.2019 um 14:16 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > On Monday 09 September 2019, Simon Poole wrote: >>> And what happens if one of the data sources has a hard visible >>> attribution requirement without the OSMF 'attribution light' >>> liberty? As you drafted things it would be perfectly all right to >>> bury OSM attribution on the bottom of some general credits page >>> while prominently attributing some other source because this was >>> required while the OSMF settled for less. >> Where does the draft say that? > The shoe is on the other foot - where does the guideline draft say that > the permission to show OSM attribution only on a separate page under > certain conditions depends on no other data source being attributed > more prominently?
Why should it? There is no such requirement in the ODbL. I suspect you are confusing CC BY-SA attribution requirements with those of the ODbL. > None of your two formulation drafts shown here states anything in that > direction: > > /If OpenStreetMap data accounts for a minority (less than 50%) part of > the visible map rendering, attribution with other sources on a separate > page that is visible after user interaction is acceptable. / > > /If OpenStreetMap is not the largest data provider for the visible map > rendering, attribution with other sources on a separate page that is > visible after user interaction is acceptable./ >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
