On Wednesday 11 September 2019, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > The main thing we're missing is curated, simple information on the > main tags that are _used_.
Indeed. And i would go even further: Any documentation of the de facto use of tags written by humans (i.e. that goes beyond automatic analysis like taginfo), written and maintained in a way that ensures it actually does document the de facto situation, would be immensely useful and important. > It needs an > editor/curator/whatever, to have clear editorial guidelines, and > probably to run on the pull request model rather than open editing. Is there any mature and writer centric software that implements this kind of model? I mean that from the perspective of a documentation author offers a wiki like functionality with decent preview and formatting but at the same time comes with a kind of version management and functions to facilitate editorial review and discussion. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
