Conspiracy: tagging a grassy knoll "the place JFK was shot from" Nitpicking: You rounded off the 16th decimal on a city's name tag, losing a maximum on 10cm of precision....on...a...city...name....tag.
On Mon., Nov. 4, 2019, 4:56 a.m. Martin Koppenhoefer, < dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've read this several times in different occasions, but I never > understood the "no conspiracy theory" clause. Who decides what a conspiracy > theory is, and what a conspiracy? Wouldn't it be a perfect means to silence > criticism, if one wanted, to declare any critique a "conspiracy theory"? > > Similarly, "nitpicking". When is something "nitpicking" and when is it a > useful observation of a detail? Especially in tagging discussions, "no > nitpicking" doesn't necessarily seem to be a productive instruction. > > Could you please clarify? Maybe I missed something and you didn't mean to > point to the 11 June 2011 version, which according to the wiki is the > binding OSMF adopted version of the etiquette guidelines? > > Cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
