sent from a phone
> Il giorno 19 feb 2020, alle ore 15:17, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> ha > scritto: > > > Am 19.02.2020 um 14:40 schrieb Joseph Eisenberg: >>> IMHO attribution should always be required 1. on the map 2. in high >>> contrast >> Agreed. >> The main problem is that mobile devices, which are by far the most >> common ways of accessing maps around the world, are only required to >> provide attribution after a click or swipe, or even just on app >> startup with a short "splash" screen: > Providing attribution on splash screen is an obvious and widely accepted > way of attribution completely independently of the guideline we are > discussing here. for maps the standard is on screen permanent attribution. I agree with Joseph that splash screen attribution combined with a permanent (different) logo or attribution for the service that uses OpenStreetMap data could be very misleading. The sentence „ Small thumbnails/icons do not require attribution.“ should be expanded. For example facebook used to show small maps for places with a location, which could eventually be argumented as „small thumbnails“ but which are also usable and useful maps and should be attributed. Imho we should not differentiate between mobile and desktop devices: either there is sufficient space and attribution should be permanent, or there isn’t and it is ok you have to click somewhere to see it. The constraints/conditions for being sufficient space are the same on mobile devices and other devices. Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
