> Today's blog posts are the press releases of past years. It would have been >quite possible to run it past the responsible organs of the organisation they >were writing about, as it would have been customary in earlier days.
Good enough idea, but I have seen very few or even no examples of someone asking OSMF about a PR/blog beforehand, nor the OSMF asking for that. Not a bad idea to change expectations around this. -Mikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron On Friday, March 20, 2020, 04:43:28 PM EDT, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: Am 20.03.2020 um 20:00 schrieb Mikel Maron: >> But this thread is from Facebook trying to change that. To side step >> imports. > No they're not. It's a couple sections in a blog post that is being wildly > misinterpreted. Today's blog posts are the press releases of past years. It would have been quite possible to run it past the responsible organs of the organisation they were writing about, as it would have been customary in earlier days. Simon > > * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron > > > > > > > On Friday, March 20, 2020, 02:18:54 PM EDT, Rory McCann > <r...@technomancy.org> wrote: > > > > > > On 19/03/2020 20:15, Mikel Maron wrote: > >> This whole thread is blown out of proportion, and rehashing old >> theoretical debates about imports that are more or less resolved in >> practice. > > Yes, we have an import guideline. But this thread is from Facebook > trying to change that. To side step imports. > > BTW the Etiqutte guidelines require you to assume all people here are > operating in good faith 😉 > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
