My local University is the same way. Students and faculty automatically get access, but community and alumni can get access by paying fees.
Is access=members an option? It implies that you have to become a member according to some criteria, but that membership is possible for a large swath of people. On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 8:34 AM Christian Rogel < christian.ro...@club-internet.fr> wrote: > Le 21 avr. 2020 à 03:26, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Currently we can already mark if the library is open to the public on not > (access=yes means open to the general public), but it's unclear how say a > school library or library restricted to attendees of an educational > facility like a university should be tagged (is it access=private since > only those people attending the institution have been given permission? > > access=customers? > > > > Libraries rarely get « customers ». In most of the public libraries, your > are free to enter, to grab any material ans to sit down for hours. No need > to suscribe for these services. > > > Besides, the libraries of the French universities are providng their > services to any person paying the fees, same as the students. > > > > > > As the type of services and the social role are rich and complex, un > unusual number of subtags is required : > > > 1. pubic targeted > 2. intellectual content (collections) > 3. material types (books, manuscripts, records, artworks, maps…) > 4. lending / no lending / mobile ending > 5. administrative status (municipal, school, county, ngo, state, > university, corporate…) > > > > > Christian Rogel > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk