Hi,

we have several channels in OSM to facilitate discussions and support. First touch point for new users is often help.openstreetmap.org. Questions relating to mapping in general, tagging, editors, development, OSM based applications are asked there and get answered in most cases.

The site is based on OSQA, a software which has not been maintained in some time. Some application errors have surface in the past but had to be ignored since no fixes are coming from OSQA any more. Until now we could live with that. They were annoying but not critical. There are open tickets on OSM github to move the help site to some other framework (https://github.com/openstreetmap/operations/issues/149, https://github.com/openstreetmap/operations/issues/377) but there isn't exactly an abundance of volunteers to take care of that.

Usability of help.openstreetmap.org has now seriously worsened over the past few days with some js error popping up for longer and longer times (https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/74831/why-does-the-add-a-new-comment-button-sometimes-not-work). Buttons to support formatting questions and answers are gone, comments cannot be added and moderation functions (reporting, converting questions to comments etc.) are not working anymore.

If this continuous we can shut down the site soon. Even if this problem got resolved somehow it's only a matter of time until a new problem arises. The site provides a low entry hurdles place to ask questions that can be solved by simple answers. I'd hate so see it gone.

I'm neither a programmer who could help out on the technical side nor am I involved in OSM organization and politics to have an idea on how this could be sorted out. Question around: Can we find someone to take care of the technical side? Can we involve any of the OSM organizations to find, maybe pay, someone? Does the community even find it worthwhile keeping the site?

cheers,

Tobias




_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to