Hi mmd mmd <mmd....@gmail.com> skrev: (23 augusti 2020 21:38:45 CEST) >On 2020-08-23 18:27, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> There is a lot of stuff that could be analyzed, immense. All the >history is still available with all the user information... > >What's next? Do we want to invite "unreliable" mappers to an exciting >two hours training course to improve their railway mapping skills? Upon >successful completion of the final test, they can earn 5 extra mapping >days that count towards their 42-day threshold for an OSMF active >contributor membership.
LOL. I don't believe in punishment or restrictions based on past performance. I believe that people do the best they can as much as the time they can. OSMF have lowered the bar of entry to people with little money which is good. More engaged members in OSMF is a good sign. Of course this new policy could also backfire and lead to 42 days of crap edits for all our millions of users in the worst case, but I hope not. > >That's a pretty dystopian view on the OSM future, if you ask me... I hope this reliability index will be used for good. I have no intention of using it to pick on others. But maybe someone we ill be curious about to he results. We could create a page that suggests what a particular user can do to get a higher score. E.g. take extra care to avoid integrity errors on your multipolygon edits. Read this page x, contact your local mapping community to find a mentor ask in a forum for help with reviewing an edit. We already have a light version here: https://hdyc.neis-one.org/ where you can profile any user after login. I never used user statistics in conversations with others because they are judgements best used to evaluate a whole. I dislike judgements about humans. Ranking and competitions are not my favorites either, but I love learning with others. So when I write other contributors I only refer to facts about a concrete edit and ask what they tried to do. I have never seen anyone anywhere in OSM use data to try to control others which is a good sign. Cheers _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
