On Jan 18, 2023, at 7:13 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps you could expand on the benefits of mapping them?

I don't wish to sound antagonistic, but that's like asking "what good is our 
map" and expecting the infinite "creative and unexpected purposes" that have, 
do and will evolve from our data to be a complete answer.  It can't ever be 
complete.

Power lines "exist."  They are "in the real world."  Sometimes they are "in the 
way."  (Perhaps I am flying my drone or hang-gliding).  Their poles and towers 
sometimes have wide swaths upon the landscape and make a human, technological 
path wherever they are, they deserved to be mapped.  So do their often-fenced 
substation structures and related infrastructure.  If an owner / power company 
needs to beef up its security, that is little to no concern of mine as an OSM 
mapper.

It's a valuable conversation to have, I'll agree.  I don't like hearing about 
rifle-accurate attacks that take out quite expensive infrastructure with a box 
of well-placed bullets, but that is the world we live in (in some places).  The 
world we map in?  I'll keep on mapping (including power infrastructure, if for 
no other reason than "others make pretty spider-webby renderings" of power 
infrastructure, and I like to look at those).  I'm not a nutter with a gun, I'm 
a mapper.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to