Doug, You're right, but I did say for ... "leading a snappy Boleo" ... not a languorous one. In that case, it's unlikely that there would be a problem with the woman's over-rotation, which was the subject of my post.
Keith, HK On Sat Dec 15 5:35 , sent: >[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> It's important to remember that leading a snappy Boleo doesn't depend on >>> force but on timing the change of direction precisely. And after the >>> sharp change of direction, it's important to slow the woman down so that >>> the over-rotation described in the previous post doesn't occur. > >But change of direction need not be sharp. Can do wonderful, languorous >boleo with (relatively) slow change of direction. Contra-boleo involves no >change of direction. Only a rotational acceleration sufficient to leave >free leg behind. No?? > >D. > > >_______________________________________________ >Tango-L mailing list >Tango-L@mit.edu >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l _______________________________________________ Tango-L mailing list Tango-L@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l