Tango For Her wrote: > Michael wrote: > > "If the frame is weak, she can't track the center." > > > I just wanted to clarify ... if you go to the extreme > of providing no frame for your follower, here is what > happens: > No.
If you provide no frame, there is no way to communicate at all. It's like having a conversation about philisophy with someone with your mouth taped over. What you name "no frame" is actually just as much a frame. It's just one that uses little static resistance and one with a little flexibility and little jerk (as defined in physics - the derivative of acceleration). It's not weak, it's light. If it's really weak, then the follower really has no way if knowing where you're going, and she has to feel it when it's too late (the tango equivalent to bungee jumping) when an (incorrect) framing relationship is eventually re-established. No doubt it keeps the follower in her toes, but not in a good way. Shock and awe should be reserved for military uses. _______________________________________________ Tango-L mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l
