> Although simplifying passing parameters to a listener is a good thing, > I'm not favorable to this change. To me, a listener is an object, not a > method. This object holds a method to be called, so it is some kind of > processor that can be handled as a normal object: used as component > parameter, passed through pages, etc.
I'm just a user, but in my use of Tapestry so far, I've always preferred to think of a listener as a method and not an object... I find it easier that way. I like to ignore the fact that Tapestry automatically creates hidden objects for me. Of course, someday I might want that feature, but I don't think this enhancement would get in the way. -Nathan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
