Fair enough. Brett has assured me that despite being snowed in he will be applying the patches needed for maven2, so I'll post an update once that is all official.
On 2/12/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Parallel thinking ... I've been using testng for ePluribus and liking > it a lot. I don't have any objections, it's just an issue about > setting up the build properly. I think the HiveMind conversion to > Maven2 as a dry run, then a Tapestry conversion to Maven2. > > On 2/11/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > P.S. This is what the new maven2 surefire report should more or less > look > > like (notice the main diff being the hide/unhide of exception data) > > > > http://testng.org/doc/samplereport/index.html > > > > On 2/11/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone have any strong feelings about possibly incorporating > testng > > > into some of the 4.1 unit tests? > > > > > > The good part about this is that testng can happily run any junit test > (as > > > well as the eclipse plugin), along with a number of additional useful > > > features: > > > > > > -) Using assertions : The testng runtime checks for assert errors, so > our > > > reliance on extending base classes becomes much less needed..ie: > > > > > > assertEquals(foo.getValue(), 1); > > > > > > turns into > > > > > > assert foo.getValue () == 1 : "Foo didn't equal 1"; //or just assert > > > foo.getValue() == 1; > > > > > > > > > -) Annotations, well I think everyone knows the benefit to this. But > the > > > additionally nice thing here is that your method names don't need to > drive > > > any part about how your tests are run. The setup/teardown logic could > go > > > away for more friendly uses of configuration, the least of which is > being > > > able to say new things like run my method: > > > > > > beforeSuite/beforeTestClass/beforeTestMethod/etc.. > > > > > > Also, grouping and "dependsOnMethod" semantics allow a whole new level > of > > > control. > > > > > > -) Is completely happy to run all junit tests. > > > > > > -) Supported in the maven2 core by yours truly. > > > > > > -) We have commit access to it which will give instant gratification > to > > > anyone disliking/wanting some feature. (though I doubt this will come > up) > > > > > > It's not a huge deal for me, it's just something that is nice to have. > I > > > won't add the dependency in unless I get an ok for it as it is > impactual on > > > our daily happiness and I certainly don't want to add something in > that will > > > become an annoyance for anyone. > > > > > > jesse > > > > > > > > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
