Addressed the issue. Apologise Tapestry :-). ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 2/13/06, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:24:57 -0500, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Is it really breaking the java annotation spec if you do a search on > > super > > classes as well? > > > > Either way I understand the frustration but don't think I can help if the > > two core devs already voted -1 on this feature. Hmmm... > > Well, the issue I raised in this thread is actually a bit different from > what you saw on the TestNG list. Since Alexandru responded separately > here, I'll try to clarify the issue for him a bit more. Like I said, at > least they're responsive :-) > > See http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/TESTNG-19 for more details. The > initial report was based on my misunderstanding of how the annotations > worked, but there still is a problem with using template methods. The > example there is weak, so I'll provide a stronger one. > > -- > Kevin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
