Hmmm....I have no intention of getting into anything 3.0 related so I'm not
sure what the best answer is. Maybe someone else does?

On 3/8/06, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In working to resolve older issues, I checked out the 3.0 branch and
> found two issues:
>
> 1.  It won't build. It looks for javassist in the wrong place. I had an
> old copy of 3.0 source and copied that javassist over to continue.
> Should I create an issue and fix it? Or is that too much for an old
> release?
>
> 2.  Tutorial2. Refers to packages in the net.sf space. Should either be
> gotten rid of from the tree, or fixed. I don't know the state it was in,
> nor the state it should be worked on - but as it's old, and obviously
> not compiling anyway...
>
> To issue, or not to issue... that's pretty much my question.
>
> Brian
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQFEDoJHaCoPKRow/gARAiPvAKDA2xNIeknKnNCL7qihbP+q4tfqpgCfalAU
> Gdtm46eHgBK4wiANLMP6oOw=
> =jGQA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to