-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Okay. If no one speaks up, I'm going to create two issues and fix them so it'll "just work". (I'd rather be in 4.0+ land, but I'd also really like old releases to keep building)
Brian Jesse Kuhnert wrote: > Hmmm....I have no intention of getting into anything 3.0 related so I'm not > sure what the best answer is. Maybe someone else does? > > On 3/8/06, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In working to resolve older issues, I checked out the 3.0 branch and > found two issues: > > 1. It won't build. It looks for javassist in the wrong place. I had an > old copy of 3.0 source and copied that javassist over to continue. > Should I create an issue and fix it? Or is that too much for an old > release? > > 2. Tutorial2. Refers to packages in the net.sf space. Should either be > gotten rid of from the tree, or fixed. I don't know the state it was in, > nor the state it should be worked on - but as it's old, and obviously > not compiling anyway... > > To issue, or not to issue... that's pretty much my question. > > Brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFED3OPaCoPKRow/gARAs9eAKDAuosyp5/Y1BksS9UDvXX5yKofgwCg7F50 0ZRZHBXqwzYbk7pR6PIYuCI= =fc8T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
