-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In going through the whole build process, I have a question about code coverage:
Currently we use Clover - a good tool, to be sure. While I understand the "if it ain't broke..." theory, is there a reason to choose Clover over Cobertura aside from the effort to switch? My reason for asking is primarily licensing and coordination. Cobertura is ASL and has ant/command-line/maven hooks/plugins. I'm not against Clover in any way (matter of fact I do like it) - just that Cobertura is something that can be used without ASF license required. [From personal experience, this would also mean a non-committer could build everything] Any thoughts? Concerns? If you haven't looked at it, the link is http://cobertura.sourceforge.net Brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFETU0AaCoPKRow/gARAuEGAKCkXj4St8FuIAW4mKYnLLGlvTcGJwCfUHBY 0AGZpfiy+mL9TtR+jtB3ESw= =Su5q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
