I have no problem switching over. It will be easier once we have a Maven2 build, I think. There's an existing Maven2 plugin, right?
On 4/24/06, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > In going through the whole build process, I have a question about code > coverage: > > Currently we use Clover - a good tool, to be sure. While I understand > the "if it ain't broke..." theory, is there a reason to choose Clover > over Cobertura aside from the effort to switch? My reason for asking is > primarily licensing and coordination. Cobertura is ASL and has > ant/command-line/maven hooks/plugins. I'm not against Clover in any way > (matter of fact I do like it) - just that Cobertura is something that > can be used without ASF license required. [From personal experience, > this would also mean a non-committer could build everything] > > Any thoughts? Concerns? > > If you haven't looked at it, the link is http://cobertura.sourceforge.net > > Brian > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFETU0AaCoPKRow/gARAuEGAKCkXj4St8FuIAW4mKYnLLGlvTcGJwCfUHBY > 0AGZpfiy+mL9TtR+jtB3ESw= > =Su5q > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
