What if the committers *are* the other PMC members? Does he still have to vote on it? I'm just curious, trying to learn the Apache way (especially since they've asked me to be the HiveMind PMC chair).
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Erenkrantz Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Tapestry development Subject: Re: Tapestry Project -- April 2006 Board Report On 4/13/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've succesfully moved the SVN repository out from under the Jakarta > project. Howard Lewis Ship has taken over responsibility for granting > SVN access karma to Tapestry team members. I imagine that the intent is right, but this phrasing is a little off. So, let me try to restate what should be going on here to ensure that we're all on the same page here. The new Tapestry PMC as a whole has the responsiblity for granting karma to new committers to Tapestry. Once a new committer is approved by the PMC, the PMC Chair (in this case, Howard) is responsible for executing that decision by twiddling the SVN karma or filing the right request forms with [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, the PMC Chair shouldn't be adding or removing committers without consulting the rest of the PMC first. Other than that, looks fine to me. Keep up the good work! -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
