I wasn't aware of that change in policy, but I'm totally in favor of it! The other was going to be a big headache.
On 4/24/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/24/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can see how this looked, but no, I wasn't granting anyone access by > > fiat, the granting of karma followed proper voting procedures. The > > thing we're working on is identifying sub-projects and determine which > > commiters will have access to each sub-project. The consensus was that > > until we actually have sub projects, we would continue as we did under > > Jakarta ... voted onto the team means access to all the code. > > As a general rule of advice, we prefer (but do not require!) that > commit access is granted to the entire TLP space instead of > partitioned out. There's a reason why Jakarta has switched back to a > TLP-wide commit model. We tend to find that by segmenting the > committers, we also segment the community - which can turn out to be a > dangerous thing down the road. -- justin > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
