Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
>Things just don't add up. If 5000 people downloaded Tapestry 2.0 and
>weren't interested, then did a different 6000 people download 2.1? Or did
>the same folks download 2.0 and 2.1, but aren't interested enough to
>subscribe to this mailing list?
>
i think most people prefer a nice, searchable web based forum...
subscribing to a mailing list seems much more of a commitment to using a
product..
as far as competition with Struts and other frameworks is concerned - i
think the major hurdle to adopting tapestry (it seems even howard is
walking in these shoes) is the all-or-nothing approach: that is you
can't just start using tapestry as a little component in an already
developed JSP application, and then gradually migrate further... i don't
think most people have problems understanding how cool tapestry is...
something along these lines would be awesome - for example, if there was
a way (eg. a custom tag) to use a tapestry component within a JSP page.
combine this with some widely reusable components (eg. a sorted table,
or even the palette component) - i think this could provide a huge boost
to using tapestry... i mean, nobody really wants to write yet another
sorted-paginated-dhtml-resultset-displaying-grid....
best regards,
viktor
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Tapestry-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
