I mostly agree with what has been said so far and just want to add two points.
Viktor Szathmary wrote: > developed JSP application, and then gradually migrate further... i don't > think most people have problems understanding how cool tapestry is... I do. A significant part of the 'web development community' is conceptually on the level of ASP/PHP/CGI scripting or maybe JSP if they're 'advanced'. I do know from experience that may people do not even remotely understand the advantages of a component architecture. Struts has the added advantage that its so absurdly twisted that you can start feeling good once you get something runnig. Since everybody else is using it, you get an immediate feelgood rush. Yes, I know I'm cynical. > something along these lines would be awesome - for example, if there was > a way (eg. a custom tag) to use a tapestry component within a JSP page. > combine this with some widely reusable components (eg. a sorted table, > or even the palette component) - i think this could provide a huge boost > to using tapestry... i mean, nobody really wants to write yet another > sorted-paginated-dhtml-resultset-displaying-grid.... WebObjects has recently started to allow this. Howard, maybe you could have a look at: http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/webobjects/JSPServlets/index.html Holger ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Tapestry-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
