hi,
Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
>I'm warming to the concept of "anonymous components" that are specified
>entirely in the HTML template. This is much more viable now (with the new
>approach to localization) than before (where localization was always
>multiple HTML templates). It's a kludge in the way that <span key="..."/>
>is a kludge ... useful enough to outweigh its limitations.
>
>
>
i think having a lighter way do define blocks that a complex component
might expect would be a good start, eg.
<span jwcid="mycomponent">
<span jwcid="mycomponent:header">Foo</span>
<span jwcid="mycomponent:body">Foo</span>
</span>
where you only define mycomponent in the jwc/page file, :header and
:body are just Block components bound to it.
best regards,
viktor
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Tapestry-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer