On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:16:48 -0700 (PDT), "Mind Bridge"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think that there are two apporoaches to the way Tapestry is developed:
> a) Keep declarations and templates separate as they are now
i agree with that, but for common cases (eg. Insert) it seems somewhat
tedious currently.
> easier implementation of tools (such as Spindle). Perhaps Geoff could say
> whether he could support a JSP-like syntax where HTML and logic are
> intermixed.
i could imagine some more tool support that would pretty much achieve
this, eg:
- tooltips in the HTML showing the given component's description with
it's bindings
- the components listed in the spindle html outline view should navigate
to the component's page
- autocompletion for bindings and simple properties, eg
components.[ctrl-space], beans.[ctrl-space] etc
best regards,
viktor
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Tapestry-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
