Re: [Tapestry-developer] RE: Page or component with dynamic attributes

[Howard M. Lewis Ship]

I think it is time and priorities.  For the moment, I'm up to my eyeballs getting Tapestry Lite functionality working; after that, I hope to be starting the long delayed Tapestry book. ----- Original Message ----- From: David Solis To: 'Howard M. Lewis Ship' Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 12:13 PM Subject: RE: [Tapestry-developer] RE: Page or component with dynamic attributes Howard,   I don�t want to disturb you, but do you mind to be a little more specific? Is it a matter of time or priorities?   I could implement this feature but I guess it is necessary to change the Tapestry spec.   Regards   David   -----Original Message----- From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 6:16 PM To: David Solis Cc: 'tapestry-developer' Subject: Re: [Tapestry-developer] RE: Page or component with dynamic attributes   Declarative persistent properties are a bit further out.  Having really scoped that one out yet. ----- Original Message ----- From: David Solis To: 'Howard M. Lewis Ship' Cc: 'tapestry-developer' Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: RE: [Tapestry-developer] RE: Page or component with dynamic attributes   Howard, thanks for the clarification.   What about my original question (Declarative Persistent Properties)?   Regards   David   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Howard M. Lewis Ship Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 8:18 PM To: David Solis; 'Luke Galea' Cc: 'tapestry-developer' Subject: Re: [Tapestry-developer] RE: Page or component with dynamic attributes   Just to emphasize this ... there'll be just one framework that can be used in different ways by different developers. ----- Original Message ----- From: David Solis To: 'Luke Galea' Cc: 'tapestry-developer' Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 5:11 PM Subject: RE: [Tapestry-developer] RE: Page or component with dynamic attributes   There is some information about Tapestry Lite in the wiki. I�m sorry, for Tapestry Pro I mean the Tapestry next version (2.3).   I guess there will two Tapestry editions, Tapestry Lite for new adopters and Tapestry Full Edition or Tapestry Pro (I don�t know the name)   David   -----Original Message----- From: Luke Galea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 4:02 PM To: David Solis; tapestry-developer Subject: RE: [Tapestry-developer] RE: Page or component with dynamic attributes   Tapestry Lite/Pro? Where can I find information on this?   Thanks   Luke Galea Software Development BlueCat Networks 905-762-5225   -----Original Message----- From: David Solis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: November 29, 2002 4:05 PM To: 'tapestry-developer' Subject: [Tapestry-developer] RE: Page or component with dynamic attributes   I saw in Tapestry wiki the page �Declarative Persistent Properties� in the Future Tapestry Features section. That feature is what I�m looking for. Are there any plans to implement it?   Just another question:   Will be Tapestry Lite compatible with Tapestry Pro (lack of a better name)? For instance anonymous components.   David   -----Original Message----- From: David Solis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 1:39 PM To: 'tapestry-developer' Subject: Page or component with dynamic attributes   Is it possible to have a page or component with dynamic properties? In our applications, almost 50% (maybe more) of code is in getters and setters. I�m wondering about the possibility to integrate Jakarta DynaBeans to Tapestry in order to eliminate these getters and setters. Does it make sense? I�m not sure about features overlap between ognl and dynabeans.   I think this should be a general requested feature. Did somebody implement it?   At this time we have developed three systems: an online banking and brokeragehouse, a financial auction and a webmail. Because of Tapestry uses standard technologies, it was really easy to integrate theses systems into WebLogic Portal.   Kudos to Howard for making difficult things easier for web developers.   Regards   David