Well, that's one of my goals, to help make Trails less "magical." It does do some pretty cool stuff behind the scenes and I feel your pain. I just recently joined the project and it has taken me quite a while to understand how it all works. I don't even understand it all yet. I'm currently trying to figure out how to make it more intuitive (it does have my EntitySqueezer implementation in it, though).
-----Original Message----- From: Andreas Bulling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Bulling Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 11:07 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Best practice - Integration Hibernate/Tapestry On 20. Feb 2006 - 10:53:22, James Carman wrote: | Have you checked out the Trails framework (https://trails.dev.java.net/)? | I'm also a committer on that project and it's a good way for you to | jump-start your way into Tapestry, Spring, Hibernate, and I'm trying to get | them to use HiveMind more (they like to use AspectJ a lot and that's one | reason they're sticking with Spring). Yeah, I also looked at Trails and read the two java.net articles. But I read somewhere that only a part of Tapestry's components is supported/implemented and for my taste Trails was doing a little bit too much magic with less possibility to look behind the scenes (after a very short look at it). Perhaps I should look at it a second time if I can't get Spring to work here... *sigh* Sincerly, Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
