Yes, that's also the case, we need to use 1.4 I would rather use Tap 4, but it's just not an option right now :(
-----Original Message----- From: Brian K. Wallace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 4 april 2006 17:43 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Tapestry 3: trouble accessing Visit object -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bode, Bianca wrote: > We're on a project where a few developers already had some experience > with 3. > Unfortunately none of them could help me with this... > > Management decided to stick to 3. > They also believe 3 is more production stable than 4. > > What do you think? As someone who has one foot in 3 and one in 4 - personal opinion - go with 4. Some things are just plain easier in 4. The only caveat would be "unless you have a need to stay pre-1.5 Java". Brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEMpQPaCoPKRow/gARAvB1AKCRp+c2VtbOlc+v1L19c8Kw1DqxEQCfbZpv 5gooj4TTqj+MKw53VewAm9w= =xE3q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
